Courses Infomation
Brian David Phillips – Happy Finger: Playful Trance Process
Everything you need to build a Second Brain
Salepage : Brian David Phillips – Happy Finger: Playful Trance Process
Description
Happy Finger:
Playful Trance Process
This DVD covers the Phillips Happy Finger trance process.
This is a playful experiential hypnosis process that is a lot of fun.
The Happy Finger is appropriate for recreational, entertainment, therapeutic, and other contexts.
The material is explained and demonstrated with several examples.
This is a very fun yet powerful process appropriate for many contexts.
Please note that an example segment of this program contains nonstandard video so that some blurring of the
image does occur in that sequence.
This is a fault in the source video and not the DVD. We regret any inconvenience.
DVT08
What is Hypnosis & NLP ?
Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) is a pseudoscientific approach to communication, personal development, and psychotherapy created by Richard Bandler and John Grinder in California, United States, in the 1970s. NLP’s creators claim there is a connection between neurological processes (neuro-), language (linguistic) and behavioral patterns learned through experience (programming), and that these can be changed to achieve specific goals in life.Bandler and Grinder also claim that NLP methodology can “model” the skills of exceptional people, allowing anyone to acquire those skills. They claim as well that, often in a single session, NLP can treat problems such as phobias, depression, tic disorders, psychosomatic illnesses, near-sightedness, allergy, the common cold, and learning disorders. NLP has been adopted by some hypnotherapists and also by companies that run seminars marketed as leadership training to businesses and government agencies.
There is no scientific evidence supporting the claims made by NLP advocates, and it has been discredited as a pseudoscience. Scientific reviews state that NLP is based on outdated metaphors of how the brain works that are inconsistent with current neurological theory and contain numerous factual errors.Reviews also found that all of the supportive research on NLP contained significant methodological flaws and that there were three times as many studies of a much higher quality that failed to reproduce the “extraordinary claims” made by Bandler, Grinder, and other NLP practitioners.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.