Courses Infomation

SEO Intelligence Agency – 3 Months Membership

**More information:

The SEO Intelligence Agency is made up of a small team of SEO experts that are committed to testing and reporting SEO data by developing specialized tests that enable them to uncover ranking factors.
These studies are made available to you once a month when you join S.I.A. The S.I.A. further supports the Agent Community on Skype and Facebook and hosts weekly and monthly webinars to discuss testing, strategies, and SEO-related issues.
As an Agent in good standing, you may also recommend experiments and myths that you’d want to have performed, validated, or debunked. Think of us as your own personal SEO R&D lab.

Features

The “stealthiest” method of connecting inner pages. (This underutilized website structure really outperformed all others in our silo building test.)

The “nuclear” connection source that we discovered has been lying in wait right beneath our eyes for years, untapped! Funny what you discover once you begin testing. This one is so potent that we considered selling IT ALONE for $997.)

The automatic Google indexing method known as “water-cooler” (I was informed about this some years ago while playing blackjack with the Google index team at the Hyatt in Lake Tahoe. I tested it and, sure enough, it was positive, but it’s time to recheck.)

How many links with the same anchor text should you send to a site before you over-optimize for that phrase? (To learn Google’s new algorithm for penalizing websites, we’ll have to wait for the subsequent Penguin update, which operates in real-time.)

What we have learned through test outcomes on the ideal location for your keywords on the page and if they should be bold, italicized, or ALL CAPS. (And how to apply this information to more skillfully create the content for your website).

The totally counterintuitive (but 100% true) strategy for dominating your competition by leveraging Google as a source for links. (It’s incredible how few people are aware of this, despite the fact that it’s simple, effective, and tested positive.)

Our testing provided us with the answer, so you can relax and stop worrying about trying to estimate how long an article should be on a page. (This exam has already been completed, and we have the rundown. Just like clockwork, the answers were straightforward and methodical. However, see for yourself.)

Can science verify the “secrets” of all the most recent SEO gurus? (If there is a secret you want us to test or confirm, simply let us know and we’ll do it.)

Does internal linking to your PBNs actually hurt them or does it help them by transferring incredible authority and link juice? Since 2010, SEOs have presummated that the answer to this query is “yes.” Will we confirm or bust?”

Knowing optimization will enable you to reassure your clients when they ask, “How many words should I have on the page?” (This required creating 10 distinct pages, but the work was worthwhile in order to obtain the solution.)

How to properly internal link your pages to promote your product pages. (In fact, if you do it this way, Google will almost eagerly anticipate crawling your page, according to test findings.)

How to handle the connections that don’t make you feel loved. (The test will determine whether or not utilizing the Disavow tool, which Google has forced down our throats, is a good idea.)

Although it frequently goes unnoticed, the “unsexy” link style that testing have shown to be the best of links must be included in your anchor formula. (Since rookies so rarely utilize them, Google has an easy time identifying SEOs.)

If you can’t afford to create your own PBNs, this is the best option to develop connections. (Also, the locations from which to establish these connections most effectively, as well as those that you should avoid because, according to the findings of our research, they never get indexed.)

Which techniques for creating “high quality” web 2.0s as tier 1 links “kicked-the-most-ass” (And which web 2.0 sites are safe to use and which should be avoided at all costs.)

Test demonstrates how to employ this weird and perplexing tactic to stand out to Google while remaining undetected and avoiding an over-optimization penalty. (Especially when surrounded by a few of the same old Google kiss bums wearing white hats.)

A “breakthrough finding” that makes it simple for even complete beginners to create links from an amazing source. (Even I didn’t consider this; Kyle IS EVERYTHING!)

determining how many times to connect to each sentence. (And if different anchor text is required while travelling to the same site, etc.)

Is “Less is More” still relevant in the new link penalty era? (Find out precisely what will cause your site to be over-optimized, and if you do, is there ever a chance to win back Google’s trust? Testing will either support or refute our hypothesis.)

The best websites to build links from are shown via tests. (And the rankings they receive)

Which websites index rapidly (but leave the index despite the page’s continued existence). Test results provide fascinating and practical information)

Whichever little notion of a domain extension has more power than you may imagine. (And is the index’s first!) came from my test of domain extensions)

What is more effective, HTML or images? (Both are correct, but which will prevail in the Myth Busting discussion?)

a covert spammer method that enables ethical white hat SEO practitioners to gain more links from their own Google accounts. (Even if I don’t believe in White Hat, what the heck, let them think it is OK to construct links without being a Black Hat.) Tests show we can obtain linkages directly from the king-pin.

Do you know what “Keyword Density” is? (How many times should you use your keyword on the page for best results? How many times is too much?) It’s time to test it once and for all and quit speculating.

Does capitalizing your term in headlines over-optimize your page—or is that simply another urban legend that needs debunking?

Does keyword density take into account H tags? (Or do they only count body weight; if so, what is the precise figure to enter and are there any variations? A test of it!)

How to reverse-engineer the best search engine of all time by “programming” (like Google) your knowledge to give you almost infinite power. (And does the knowledge that you can use every piece of data to create the “ideal website” make you even somewhat nervous?)

What “precise number” of words on a page passes the test, and how many words should you try to limit yourself to? (Has already been in your first dispatch and under the gun)

Do the regulations differ depending on the niche? (We must test it, and we’ll find out whether we can substitute lorem ipsum for “original material” while link-building.) Does the material that surrounds your link matter at all? Oh, SO trying it out!)

When is duplicate content acceptable and how awful is it really? (The fictitious “duplicate content” penalty has been a problem for our sector. Even so, does it actually exist? We’re about to test this, muwahaha)

If Google penalizes sites for being too or underly optimized, should we attempt to compute Google’s ideal optimization rate? We shall learn more.)

What does “Optimization Rate” mean and what rate is ideal while creating a website? (We examined both; this differs from “Keyword Density”)

The ideal number of times to provide links in a sentence. (Also, is the “no-follow” still the new “do-follow,” and if so, how much should be used of each. On that, test results are forthcoming.

The most important of all of these queries is if Google properties convey “link juice.” (We already know that they can be rated and indexed, but which of the ones we examined passed link juice? Are any of the others successful? We’ll find out soon enough.)

Additionally, there’s a ton more, including…

Salepage : SEO Intelligence Agency – 3 Months Membership